Dropbox vs Box

A side-by-side look at what Dropbox and Box publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldDropboxBox
CategoryCloud StorageCloud Storage
Entry price$12/mo$5/mo
Free planYesYes
Free trial30-day trial14-day trial
Tagged forFreelancersEnterprise
G2 rating unverified4.4 / 54.2 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.5 / 54.4 / 5

Where they differ

  • Entry pricing recorded here is $5/month for Box and $12/month for Dropbox. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

Dropbox

Dropbox still owns the hardest problem in file sync: keeping large files consistent across devices quickly and without conflicts, where its engine remains best-in-class. Smart Sync saves local disk space, sharing links are universally understood, and Dash adds AI search across content. But storage economics favor Google and Microsoft bundles, so Dropbox increasingly must justify itself as a premium sync tool rather than a storage utility.

Reported strengths

  • Best-in-class sync
  • Cross-platform
  • Easy sharing

Reported drawbacks

  • Pricey storage
  • Small free tier

Box

Box long ago stopped competing on consumer storage and rebuilt itself as enterprise content management: granular permissions, retention policies, compliance certifications (HIPAA, FedRAMP) and workflow automation via Box Relay. Box AI now queries documents conversationally. It is the choice when legal and IT set the requirements — collaboration features are solid but the consumer-grade polish of Drive or Dropbox is not the point.

Reported strengths

  • Strong security
  • Good admin controls
  • Enterprise-ready

Reported drawbacks

  • Less consumer-friendly
  • Sync can lag