HubSpot vs Salesforce

A side-by-side look at what HubSpot and Salesforce publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldHubSpotSalesforce
CategoryCRMCRM
Entry price$20/mo$25/mo
Free planYesNo
Free trial14-day trial30-day trial
Tagged forSmall TeamsEnterprise
G2 rating unverified4.4 / 54.3 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.5 / 54.4 / 5

Where they differ

  • HubSpot lists a free plan; Salesforce does not, though it lists a 30-day trial.
  • Entry pricing recorded here is $20/month for HubSpot and $25/month for Salesforce. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

HubSpot

HubSpot built its reputation on inbound marketing and has grown into a full customer platform where CRM, marketing, sales and service share one database. The free tier is genuinely usable — contacts, deals, forms and email tracking cost nothing — which makes it a common first CRM. The trade-off appears at scale: advanced automation, custom reporting and higher contact tiers push pricing up quickly, so growing teams should model costs two years ahead before committing.

Reported strengths

  • Generous free tier
  • Excellent onboarding
  • Deep marketing integration

Reported drawbacks

  • Gets expensive at scale
  • Add-ons cost extra

Salesforce

Salesforce is the system of record for enterprise sales teams, and almost everything about it reflects that ambition. Custom objects, Flow automation and the AppExchange ecosystem mean there is very little it cannot be configured to do — given time and often a dedicated admin. Smaller teams frequently find the Starter plans capable but the platform's depth unnecessary; its value compounds in complex, multi-team pipelines where governance and reporting matter more than simplicity.

Reported strengths

  • Extremely customizable
  • Huge ecosystem
  • Scales to enterprise

Reported drawbacks

  • Steep learning curve
  • Costly
  • Needs an admin