Zapier vs IFTTT

A side-by-side look at what Zapier and IFTTT publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldZapierIFTTT
CategoryAutomationAutomation
Entry price$20/mo$3/mo
Free planYesYes
Free trial14-day trial7-day trial
Tagged forFreelancersFreelancers
G2 rating unverified4.5 / 54.3 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.7 / 54.4 / 5

Where they differ

  • Entry pricing recorded here is $3/month for IFTTT and $20/month for Zapier. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

Zapier

Zapier is the connective glue of business software, with an integration catalog — 7,000+ apps — that no competitor approaches. Multi-step Zaps, filters, paths and now AI steps let non-developers automate real workflows in minutes, and Tables plus Interfaces edge it toward an app platform. Task-based pricing is the perennial complaint: high-volume automations get expensive fast, which is precisely where Make and n8n make their pitch.

Reported strengths

  • Largest app library
  • Easy to use
  • Free tier

Reported drawbacks

  • Task pricing adds up
  • Limited logic vs rivals

IFTTT

IFTTT remains the gentlest introduction to automation: if this, then that, across an ecosystem especially strong in smart home, phones and consumer services. Applets install in two taps, and the Pro tier is impressively cheap for multi-action logic. It is not built for business workflows — no complex branching, light app coverage for B2B SaaS — but for personal and IoT automation it still occupies a niche the heavyweight tools ignore.

Reported strengths

  • Very simple
  • Great for IoT
  • Cheap Pro plan

Reported drawbacks

  • Limited business logic
  • Fewer pro integrations