monday.com vs Trello

A side-by-side look at what monday.com and Trello publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
Fieldmonday.comTrello
CategoryProject ManagementProject Management
Entry price$9/mo$5/mo
Free planYesYes
Free trial14-day trial14-day trial
Tagged forSmall TeamsFreelancers
G2 rating unverified4.7 / 54.4 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.6 / 54.5 / 5

Where they differ

  • Entry pricing recorded here is $5/month for Trello and $9/month for monday.com. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

monday.com

monday.com sells a 'Work OS' rather than a project tool: colorful, spreadsheet-like boards that teams reshape into CRMs, content calendars, sprint trackers or intake queues. Its automation recipes and dashboard widgets are unusually approachable, which explains its popularity with marketing and operations teams. Pricing is the friction point — per-seat tiers with three-seat minimums and key features gated behind higher plans mean costs climb as adoption spreads.

Reported strengths

  • Highly visual
  • Very flexible
  • Good automations

Reported drawbacks

  • Pricing tiers add up
  • Min seat requirements

Trello

Trello is the tool people recommend when someone has never used a project manager: a board, lists and cards explain themselves in seconds. Power-Ups and Butler automation quietly extend it further than its simplicity suggests, handling recurring tasks and cross-board workflows. It starts to creak when work needs dependencies, workload views or formal reporting — that is usually the moment teams graduate to heavier platforms, often reluctantly.

Reported strengths

  • Dead simple
  • Generous free plan
  • Flexible boards

Reported drawbacks

  • Limited for complex projects
  • Reporting is basic