Notion vs Trello

A side-by-side look at what Notion and Trello publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldNotionTrello
CategoryProject ManagementProject Management
Entry price$10/mo$5/mo
Free planYesYes
Free trialYes14-day trial
Tagged forFreelancersFreelancers
G2 rating unverified4.7 / 54.4 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.7 / 54.5 / 5

Where they differ

  • Entry pricing recorded here is $5/month for Trello and $10/month for Notion. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

Notion

Notion blurs the line between documents and databases: any page can become a wiki, a kanban board, a CRM or a content pipeline, all linked together. That flexibility made it the default workspace for startups and creators, and Notion AI adds drafting and summarization on top. Its weakness is the flip side of its strength — without conventions it sprawls, and dedicated project features like dependencies and workload management remain thinner than in purpose-built PM tools.

Reported strengths

  • Incredibly flexible
  • Great for docs
  • Strong free plan

Reported drawbacks

  • Not a dedicated PM tool
  • Can get messy

Trello

Trello is the tool people recommend when someone has never used a project manager: a board, lists and cards explain themselves in seconds. Power-Ups and Butler automation quietly extend it further than its simplicity suggests, handling recurring tasks and cross-board workflows. It starts to creak when work needs dependencies, workload views or formal reporting — that is usually the moment teams graduate to heavier platforms, often reluctantly.

Reported strengths

  • Dead simple
  • Generous free plan
  • Flexible boards

Reported drawbacks

  • Limited for complex projects
  • Reporting is basic