Plausible vs Mixpanel

A side-by-side look at what Plausible and Mixpanel publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldPlausibleMixpanel
CategoryAnalyticsAnalytics
Entry price$9/mo$24/mo
Free planNoYes
Free trial30-day trialYes
Tagged forFreelancersStartups
G2 rating unverified4.7 / 54.6 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.8 / 54.5 / 5

Where they differ

  • Mixpanel lists a free plan; Plausible does not, though it lists a 30-day trial.
  • Entry pricing recorded here is $9/month for Plausible and $24/month for Mixpanel. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.

Head to head

Plausible

Plausible is web analytics reduced to what most sites actually need: one lightweight script, one readable dashboard, no cookies and no consent banner required for it. As an EU-hosted, open-source, subscription-funded product, its privacy stance is structural rather than marketing. It deliberately omits user-level funnels, session recordings and ad-platform integrations — sites that live on paid acquisition will miss those, while content sites rarely do.

Reported strengths

  • Privacy-friendly
  • Tiny script
  • Simple to read

Reported drawbacks

  • Fewer features
  • No deep funnels

Mixpanel

Mixpanel answers product questions Google Analytics struggles with: which features drive retention, where funnels leak, how cohorts behave over weeks. Its funnels, retention curves and cohort tools are fast and genuinely self-serve for product managers. Getting value depends on a disciplined event taxonomy — bad instrumentation yields confident-looking nonsense — and costs rise with event volume, so teams should design their tracking plan before, not after, adopting it.

Reported strengths

  • Great event analytics
  • Free tier
  • Fast UI

Reported drawbacks

  • Setup effort
  • Costly at volume