Goals from Loops vs Brevo

A side-by-side look at what Goals from Loops and Brevo publish about pricing, plans and features.

This page sets the two products' recorded data side by side. It is not an editorial review — nobody has tested either product for this page, and the figures below are not independently verified. Read how we handle data and what each label means.

Values as recorded in this guide. Where a figure carries no source, it is marked unverified — confirm on the vendor's own pages before acting on it.
FieldGoals from LoopsBrevo
CategoryEmail MarketingEmail Marketing
Entry price$49/mo$9/mo
Free planYesYes
Free trialNoYes
Tagged forStartupsSmall Teams
G2 rating unverified4.5 / 5
Capterra rating unverified4.4 / 5
ProductHunt 372
From ProductHunt, checked 3 Aug 2026

Where they differ

  • Entry pricing recorded here is $9/month for Brevo and $49/month for Goals from Loops. Plan structures differ, so these are not like-for-like — check both pricing pages before comparing totals.
  • Brevo lists a free trial; Goals from Loops does not.

Head to head

Goals from Loops

Loops is an email marketing platform specifically designed for SaaS companies, offering a unified solution for sending product, marketing, and transactional emails. It provides a clean, Notion-style editor, robust API, and automation capabilities for building lifecycle workflows. Its "Goals" feature allows users to track campaign effectiveness by measuring specific conversion targets beyond traditional metrics like opens and clicks.

Reported strengths

  • Free tier with full automation access
  • Unified platform for all email types
  • No feature gating across paid plans

Reported drawbacks

  • Fewer templates compared to competitors
  • Limited advanced design flexibility
  • No SMS or multi-channel support

Brevo

Brevo (formerly Sendinblue) competes on inclusiveness: email, SMS, WhatsApp campaigns, transactional sending and a basic CRM in one plan, priced by emails sent rather than contacts stored. That pricing model is a quiet advantage for large lists with modest sending volume. The trade-offs are a template library and automation depth a notch below category leaders, making it strongest for cost-conscious businesses that want one tool covering many channels adequately.

Reported strengths

  • Very affordable
  • Generous free tier
  • SMS included

Reported drawbacks

  • UI rough in places
  • Support varies